BREAKING NEWS Full Press Coverage is building the next-generation sports conversation.
Featured

Are the Raiders Contenders? Three Tests Against the Chiefs

The Raiders are 3-0, but Sunday against Kansas City offers a deeper test. Sustained drives, pass protection and stops without turnovers will reveal more than the score alone.

October 4, 20264 minutes read
Mike Goodwin's avatar
FPC CONTRIBUTORMike GoodwinOctober 4, 2026 · 4 mins read
Mike GoodwinFPC Staff Writer
YOUR TAKEWhat do you think?
COMMENT ›
IN THE FPC HUDDLEShare this story
Share on XShare on LinkedIn

The Raiders do not need a perfect record in October to become a legitimate contender. They need an offense that can function without a short field and a defense that can end possessions without taking the ball away. Sunday against Kansas City is an opportunity to show both.

Las Vegas and Kansas City enter their Week 4 meeting at Allegiant Stadium at 3-0. That makes the game consequential. It does not make the final score a complete verdict on either team’s season.

A Raiders victory would strengthen their position in the AFC West. The more useful question is what the performance would tell us about their ability to keep winning when the game becomes less accommodating.

Can the Raiders score when the defense does not hand them the field?

The clearest reason for optimism also raises the most important question. According to the Chiefs’ official matchup preview, Las Vegas leads the NFL with nine takeaways and a plus-five turnover margin through three games. The Raiders also have the league’s best average starting field position, at their own 39.9-yard line.

Those possessions count. Forcing turnovers is valuable defensive work, and capitalizing on them is part of winning. But an offense needs another way to move the ball when the opponent protects it.

Watch the possessions that begin inside the Raiders’ own 25. Can they generate first downs before third-and-long arrives? Can they finish a long drive with a touchdown? Points per possession on those drives would say more about offensive sustainability than raw scoring totals alone.

That is an evaluation lens, not a claim that one afternoon can settle the question. A handful of possessions still needs context, including penalties, field position and the game situation.

Can the protection hold up when the first option is covered?

Las Vegas will be without starting right guard Jackson Powers-Johnson because of a groin injury. His absence makes the interior protection an especially useful place to look.

The important number will not simply be sacks allowed. A hurried throw that falls incomplete can damage a drive without appearing in the sack column. Track pressure on obvious passing downs and whether Kirk Cousins has room to step into throws.

Brock Bowers gives the Raiders a valuable answer in the passing game. The next question is what happens when Kansas City takes away the easiest completion. Can the offense reach its second option without the play breaking down?

A quick passing plan can help. So can protection adjustments. The test is whether those answers still produce first downs, rather than merely getting the ball out before contact.

Can the defense force punts as well as turnovers?

Kansas City presents a challenge beyond containing Patrick Mahomes. The Raiders’ official preview lists Kenneth Walker III with a league-leading 360 rushing yards entering Week 4.

That balance matters. Selling out to pressure the quarterback can create opportunities for the running game; committing extra resources to the run can leave coverage exposed.

The strongest evidence for Las Vegas would be a series of ordinary stops: a modest gain on first down, a contested incompletion and a tackle short of the sticks. Those possessions lack the drama of an interception, but they demonstrate that the defense has more than one way to win.

Third-down results should be judged alongside the distances. Repeatedly allowing manageable third downs creates a different problem from surrendering one exceptional conversion against tight coverage.

 

What would count as convincing evidence?

A win built on sustained drives, sound protection and defensive stops would give the Raiders a stronger case than a win requiring another avalanche of takeaways. Both would matter in the standings. The former would be easier to trust going forward.

Likewise, a close loss would not erase the opening three victories. It would deserve scrutiny of its own: whether Las Vegas could move the ball, adapt to coverage and recover after an unsuccessful possession.

Sunday can strengthen the argument that the Raiders belong in the contender conversation. The most persuasive case would be visible between the highlights—on the long fields, difficult downs and possessions when nobody hands them an advantage.

 

Want to write, edit, host, or produce with FPC? Join the staff →

FPC COMMUNITY

Join the conversation

Bring your take to the huddle. Comments are reserved for Full Press Coverage members.

FPC QUICK POLLWhat is your prediction?
YOUR TAKEWhere do you stand?
SORT

Strong takes rise. Keep it respectful.

FPC membership required to comment.Sign in or join to add your take to this story.JOIN / LOG IN ›

Discover more from Full Press Coverage | Sports News, Analysis, Podcasts & More

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading